Your web-browser is very outdated, and as such, this website may not display properly. Please consider upgrading to a modern, faster and more secure browser. Click here to do so.
Nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives and physician assistants could perform a type of early abortion under a bill approved Monday by the state Senate, leaving the measure one step from the governor.
The measure by Assemblywoman Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, would let those medical professionals perform what are known as aspiration abortions during the first trimester. The method involves inserting a tube and using suction to terminate a pregnancy.
The Senate approved AB154 on a mostly party-line, 25-11 vote, sending it back to the Assembly for a final vote on amendments.
Expanding the list of professionals who can perform those types of abortions would help make them available in areas that have few doctors, said Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson, D-Santa Barbara, who carried the measure in the Senate. She said about half of California counties lack abortion providers.
“All women deserve access to care in their local communities,” she said.
The procedure is safest when performed early, yet women in rural areas often have difficulty arranging for and traveling to a provider, she said.
Several Republicans objected to the expansion, saying it would increase medical risks for patients.
“Abortion is a serious medical procedure with vast complications, and I would argue that only the best-trained should conduct such an operation,” said Sen. Jim Nielsen, R-Gerber. “It has direct and profound impact on lives: the mother and the baby — and there is a baby.”
Sen. Joel Anderson, R-Alpine, said legalized abortion was supposed to end the days when women’s lives were put at risk. Yet he said Atkins’ bill would allow the procedures by providers who have less training and in clinics without sufficient backup if there are complications.
Jackson responded that the medical professionals covered by the bill have been performing the procedure for six years without significant problems. The bill requires them to get specialized training and follow standard procedures.
Under a state pilot program created in 2007, 8,000 aspiration abortions have been provided by non-doctors. Data from the program showed both doctors and non-doctors performing the procedures with error rates below 2 percent, Jackson said.
Oregon, Montana, Vermont and New Hampshire already allow nurse practitioners to perform these abortions. Under California law, nurse practitioners can administer medicine to induce an abortion.
Sen. Lou Correa, D-Anaheim, joined Republicans in voting against the bill, while three senators did not vote: Republicans Bill Emmerson of Redlands and Mark Wyland of Escondido; and Democrat Ben Hueso of San Diego.
Finally, some good news on the reproductive rights front! If only this could expand to New Jersey (and throughout the US).
In the four years leading up to the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, a group of women called the Jane Collective performed abortions on Chicago women who came for help. Originally, they only counseled and referred these women to licensed doctors, but were dismayed by the lack of control and knowledge these doctors allowed their patients. Patients were blindfolded, rarely spoken to, and charged outrageous fees for a simple procedure.
Over 12,000 abortions were performed by the Jane Collective for about $25 each, though no one who couldn’t afford it was turned away. Not a single patient of the Jane Collective died.
Abortion is a safe procedure in the hands of a trained professional in a sterile environment. Aspiration abortion is a straightforward, simple procedure that takes less than 15 minutes, and does not need to be restricted to physicians. Expand access to early abortion and you reduce the need for later abortions.
[Picture is of a young woman, overlaid with text explaining that she died in 2007 due to complications for an abortion.]
I met Laura’s mom at a Stand for Life event at UCF. She gave me this pic, and asked me to show it to people and spread her story. Safe abortions are NOT safe!
I’m very sorry to hear of the loss of Laura’s life, and the loss that her mother is experiencing.
The existence of women who die from safe abortions is not evidence that abortions are unsafe, similar to how the existence of people who die in airplane accidents is not evidence that air travel is unsafe.
Safe abortions are safer than childbirth.
At roughly 1 death per 150,000 abortions, that’s less than your chances of dying in a car crash if you drive from New York to Chicago. It’s close to your chance of being struck by lightning over the course of 5 years.
Remember, that’s the chance of death for abortion at all gestational ages… those deaths are mostly going to be later-term abortion, in patients with comorbidities like diabetes or clotting disorders.
We will see a lot more stories like this one if we ever outlaw abortion. Laura’s family could get justice because Laura didn’t have to keep her abortion and doctor secret for fear of legal repercussions. There are standards set in place by the state Boards of Medicine that doctors must adhere to - Osathanondh didn’t, and neither did the butchers who killed and maimed scores of people before Roe v. Wade. The majority of physicians who perform abortions, however, do. Fewer than 0.3% of patients experience complications leading to hospitalization, and the chance of death in the first 8 weeks is literally one in a million.
Page 1 of 5